American Conspiracies

禁談國內政治、禁發廣告,否則暢所欲言!

Re: American Conspiracies

文章 Wildcat » 13-05-2017, 15:32 •  [Post 21 樓]

The Betrayal of America: How the Supreme Court Undermined the Constitution & Appointed BUSH as president

The Court majority, after KNOWINGLY transforming the votes of 50 million Americans into NOTHING and THROWING OUT all of the Florida undervotes (around 60,000), actually wrote that their ruling was intended to preserve "the fundamental right" to vote. This elevates audacity to symphonic and operatic level. The Court went on to say, after "stealing" the election from the American people, "None are more conscious of the vital limits on its judicial authority than are the members of this Court, and none stand more in admiration of the Constitution's design to leave the selection of the President to the American people."

CAN you IMAGINE that ?

Author: Mr Vincent Bugliosi (the MOST compassionate and courageous lawyer in modern America)
Publisher: Nation Books; 2nd Paperback Edition edition (May 4, 2001)

KNOWINGLY 故意地,蓄意地

transform 使徹底改觀;使大變樣

throw sth out 拒絕接受,否決(計劃或想法);拒絕受理(案件)

preserve 保護,維護;保存;保養

fundamental 基礎的;基本的;主要的|

elevates 提升;提高;改進

audacity 大膽;勇氣

be conscious of sth/ sb 意識到;察覺到;感覺到

vital 必不可少的;極其重要的

judicial 司法的;審判(上)的

admiration 欽佩;羨慕;讚賞;欣賞
最後由 Wildcat 於 19-05-2017, 16:06 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。
頭像
Wildcat
擁躉
 
文章: 990
註冊時間: 09-03-2008, 21:21

Re: American Conspiracies

文章 Wildcat » 14-05-2017, 16:04 •  [Post 22 樓]

DOCUMENTS BUSH DOESN'T WANT YOU TO READ

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura with Mr Dick Russell
Publisher: SKYHORSE PUBLISHING, INC.

"Bin Laden Determined to strike in U.S.," BUSH WAS TOLD

Two months before the events of September 11th, 2001, an FBI agent in Phoenix named Mr Kenneth Williams sent a memo to the bureau brass in D.C. and New York. The responsible agent was warning about an unusually HIGH number of Muslims being trained at American flight schools, perhaps part of "a coordinated effort" by Osama bin Laden. His memo WAS IGNORED by BUSH.

A little more than a month befor 9/11, BUSH received an intelligence digest from the CIA with a two-page section titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." HOWEVER, BUSH HEADED for a month's vacation to HIS ranch in Crawford, Texas, right after that.

What these warnings -- and there were others -- tell me is that (a) either BUSH ALLOWED 9/11 to happen; (b) TOOK PART IN it happening , or (c) ... These warnings were SO plain and simple ......

Determined 下決心

strike 突然侵襲;使受折磨;使遭受重創

vacation 休假, 渡假

ranch 大牧場,大農場

TOOK PART IN 參與

plain 清楚的,明顯的
最後由 Wildcat 於 19-05-2017, 14:25 編輯,總共編輯了 2 次。
頭像
Wildcat
擁躉
 
文章: 990
註冊時間: 09-03-2008, 21:21

Re: American Conspiracies

文章 Wildcat » 14-05-2017, 16:37 •  [Post 23 樓]

DOCUMENTS BUSH DOESN'T WANT YOU TO READ

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura with Mr Dick Russell
Publisher: SKYHORSE PUBLISHING, INC.

BUSH'S "Stand Down Order" on 9/11

The question that's haunted me from day one is how come the world's biggest military superpower was somehow oblivious to rogue airliners in American air space for MORE than an hour, and our top brass seemed so befuddled in terms of dealing with hijackers apparently using these FOUR planes as flying bombs. WHY couldn't our fighter jets intercept at least ONE of them ?!

Well, here's one possible explanation: BUSH'S Secretary of Defense, NEVER gave the go-ahead. Why? On June 1, 2001, the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued a NEW Instruction -- superseding one from 1997 -- that REQUIRED approval by BUSH's Secretary of Defense for any "potentially lethal support ... in the event of an aircraft piracy (hijacking)."

I sure would like to know WHY the question of BUSH doing this NEVER came up with the 9/11 Commission. Doesn't it seem important to have asked WHY that CRITICAL policy got CHANGED ONLY four months beforehand ?

Stand Down 不防禦

haunted 使經常苦惱;不斷困擾

oblivious (尤指對周圍發生的事情) 毫不在意的,毫無知覺的,未察覺的

rogue 異常的;行為失常的;常製造麻煩的

airliners 大型客機,班機

top brass 高層;(尤指)高級軍官

befuddled 迷惑的,糊塗的

in terms of/ in ... terms 在…方面;從…方面來說;根據…來看

hijacker 劫持客機者

apparently 實際上

intercept 攔截,截住

go-ahead (有關當局) 認可,許可

the Joint Chiefs of Staff (美國) 參謀長聯席會議

superseding 替代,取代(尤指陳舊或過時之物)

potentially 潛在地;可能地

lethal 致命的;極其危險的

piracy 搶劫

CRITICAL 關鍵性的;決定性的;至關重要的

beforehand 事先,預先
最後由 Wildcat 於 19-05-2017, 15:23 編輯,總共編輯了 2 次。
頭像
Wildcat
擁躉
 
文章: 990
註冊時間: 09-03-2008, 21:21

Re: American Conspiracies

文章 Wildcat » 14-05-2017, 18:49 •  [Post 24 樓]

The "Free Fall" of Building 7

The third skyscraper that got reduced to rubble on 9/11 was the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which went down late that afternoon. According to the government, the reason was fires caused by the collapse of the Twin Towers. What I wondered about from the front was, how come fires had never before destroyed a steel skyscraper ?

Here's the rub: Building 7 came down so fast that it was at virtually the same rate as a free-falling object. Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement have been pointing this out for years. But that didn't jive with the offical story, because free fall can only take place when an object has no structural components below it. And the only way that could happen to a building would be to remove the lower structural components with an external force like explosives. Otherwise, you'd be defying Newton's laws of physics.

DOCUMENTS BUSH DOESN'T WANT YOU TO READ

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura with Mr Dick Russell
Publisher: SKYHORSE PUBLISHING, INC.

Free Fall (重力作用下的) 自由下落,自由落體運動

skyscraper 摩天大樓

reduce sth to sth 將 (尤指大型建築物) 徹底摧毀;將…夷為平地

story 樓層,層

wondered 感到驚訝,覺得驚奇

how come 怎麼會?為甚麼?

the rub 問題,困難,障礙

virtually 幾乎;實際上;實質上

jive with sth 與…一致,與…相符

explosives 炸藥,爆炸物;引爆裝置

defying 對抗;違抗;反抗
最後由 Wildcat 於 19-05-2017, 16:57 編輯,總共編輯了 3 次。
頭像
Wildcat
擁躉
 
文章: 990
註冊時間: 09-03-2008, 21:21

Re: American Conspiracies

文章 Wildcat » 17-05-2017, 12:30 •  [Post 25 樓]

當 您一恐懼, 可能就會感到小布殊說的是 … , 但若 您能安定下來, 很自然會有令一番領悟 …

四部民航客機 (即 "無" 任何武裝), 竟能不可思議地擊敗全球第一美國軍方的四千億 "美元" (即 3,1000,000,000,000 港元) 最先進的防衛系統 ! 整個所謂恐襲過程竟又奇蹟地 “無” 一架 F-16 戰機進行升空攔截 !

9/11 慘劇後, 小布殊向全世界宣稱 9/11 慘劇的幕後總指揮是一個躲在寸草不生、民眾財盡的阿富汗的一個山洞的一個阿拉伯人 !

P.S. 小布殊八年都是以 “創造” 大恐懼、大慘劇治國 …

According to the BUSH’S conspiracy theory, nineteen suicidal Middle Eastern Muslim hijackers, … hijacked FOUR airliners. (But NOT even one F-16 was scrambled to intercept) Reportedly, two planes were crashed into the Twin Towers of New York City’s World Trade Center, a third into the Pentagon, and the fourth crashed in rural western Pennsylvania after its passengers fought with the hijackers. This whole “MISSION IMPOSSIBLE” operation, miraculously able to defeat the the United States’ four-hundred-billion-dollar defense system, reportedly was under the total control a zealous Muslim cleric using a computer while hiding in a cave in Afghanistan.

conspiracy 陰謀;密謀;謀劃

was scrambled (使)(飛機) 緊急起飛

intercept 攔截

miraculously 不可思議地

four-hundred-billion-dollar 4千億美元 (即 3,1000,000,000,000 港元)

THE TERROR CONSPIRACY: Deception, 9/11 and the Loss of Liberty
Author: Mr JIM MARRS
Publisher: disinformation
最後由 Wildcat 於 19-05-2017, 15:55 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。
頭像
Wildcat
擁躉
 
文章: 990
註冊時間: 09-03-2008, 21:21

Re: American Conspiracies

文章 Wildcat » 19-05-2017, 13:54 •  [Post 26 樓]

A miracle apparently took place on 9/11. Like Mr David Chandler said, “Free fall can ONLY be achieved if there is ZERO resistance to the motion.” Interestingly, the final NIST report NO longer said anything about its analysis being “consistent with physical principles.” SURPRISINGLY, they DIDN’T admit anything about a professional demolition job. BUT a professional DEMOLITION job was the ONLY way this could have happened. Building 7 DIDN’T come down because heat from fires caused the steel to weaken and collapse. It WAS assisted to the ground by some type of EXPLOSIVE DEVICE that could remove all resistance.

DOCUMENTS BUSH DOESN'T WANT YOU TO READ

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura with Mr Dick Russell
Publisher: SKYHORSE PUBLISHING, INC.

apparently 實際上

consistent with 一致的,吻合的;符合的

SURPRISINGLY 意外地,出人意料地

demolition 炸除,炸毀

EXPLOSIVE DEVICE ( = a bomb) 炸彈
頭像
Wildcat
擁躉
 
文章: 990
註冊時間: 09-03-2008, 21:21

Re: American Conspiracies

文章 Wildcat » 19-05-2017, 17:15 •  [Post 27 樓]

The "Free Fall" of Building 7

The third skyscraper that got reduced to rubble on 9/11 was the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which went down late that afternoon. According to the government, the reason was fires caused by the collapse of the Twin Towers. What I wondered about from the front was, how come fires had never before destroyed a steel skyscraper ?

Here's the rub: Building 7 came down so fast that it was at virtually the same rate as a free-falling object. Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement have been pointing this out for years. But that didn't jive with the offical story, because free fall can only take place when an object has no structural components below it. And the only way that could happen to a building would be to remove the lower structural components with an external force like explosives. Otherwise, you'd be defying Newton's laws of physics.

DOCUMENTS BUSH DOESN'T WANT YOU TO READ

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura with Mr Dick Russell
Publisher: SKYHORSE PUBLISHING, INC.

Free Fall (重力作用下的) 自由下落,自由落體運動

skyscraper 摩天大樓

reduce sth to sth 將 (尤指大型建築物) 徹底摧毀;將…夷為平地

story 樓層,層

wondered 感到驚訝,覺得驚奇

how come 怎麼會?為甚麼?

the rub 問題,困難,障礙

virtually 幾乎;實際上;實質上

jive with sth 與…一致,與…相符

explosives 炸藥,爆炸物;引爆裝置

defying 對抗;違抗;反抗
頭像
Wildcat
擁躉
 
文章: 990
註冊時間: 09-03-2008, 21:21

上一頁

回到 吹水區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 2 位訪客